Custom Coatings: How to adhere to 4 hard-to-bond food packaging surfaces

The food packaging industry is home to a variety of packaging, from high glosses that boost shelf appeal to wax boxes that increase functionality. Whilcustom coatings e these unique packaging materials offer a competitive edge in the food industry, they are much more difficult to adhere to and often require specialized adhesives.

Without the right adhesive, you may face pop-opens and other sealing failures, increasing the amount of money and time spent on rework and scrap. By working with their adhesive suppliers, adhesive users can ensure they are using the right product for their food packaging application.

Here are four different types of hard-to-bond paper stocks you might be using for your food packaging, and tips on how you can get better bonds.

1. Wax coatings or wax impregnated

On a warm summer day, many of us enjoy grilling out on the patio and eating a delicious meal with friends and family. It’s not often we consider the way that these foods are shipped and safely arrive at the grocery store for us to purchase.

Poultry, seafood, produce and other perishable food items can get messy during shipping, which is why these products require a special packaging solution to ensure they safely reach their destination. Boxes coated or impregnated with wax are commonly used for these types of foods.                     

Wax is curtain coated or impregnated into various paper stocks to act as a moisture barrier between the paper fibers and food product. In curtain coated boxes, the wax is concentrated only on the surface of the paper stock, making it difficult for an adhesive to penetrate to the fibers and form a bond.

Wax-impregnated boxes contain wax throughout their fibers. Although these boxes have a higher wax content, the wax is not as concentrated on the top layer, making it slightly easier to bond.

For these types of packaging, we would recommend an adhesive with a long open time, enabling it to penetrate through the wax and form a full fiber-tearing bond.

2. Recycled content

Did you know that corrugated is the most-recycled packaging material on earth? In fact, the average corrugated box consists of 46% recycled fiber.

Just about every product under the sun is shipped using corrugated packaging. It’s rare to find corrugated that isn’t recycled, especially with the prominence of sustainable packaging. Although good for the environment, recycled fibers are more difficult to bond than virgin.

Recycled corrugated is manufactured by breaking down previously used paper and corrugated into pulp, removing contaminants and then reforming into new boxes. The breakdown process means recycled fibers are shorter and more compact than the original fibers, making it harder for adhesives to penetrate and form a good mechanical bond.

Virgin corrugated is less dense due to the longer interwoven fibers allowing adhesive to better wet out and form a bond. Like a tree growing roots in clay versus aerated soil, adhesives can form their “roots” easier on virgin fibers, than on dense recycled fibers.

More commonly, we are seeing adhesive users working closely with their suppliers so that they can pinpoint a specific adhesive—from the many available—to seal their recycled corrugated packaging.

3. High-gloss coatings

Walking through the grocery store aisle, there are many types of packaging—some more appealing than others. You may even be compelled to purchase a product over another due to its packaging. What is it that makes it more appealing?

High gloss, colorful packaging tends to stand out on store shelves and is eye-catching to consumers. Although this type of packaging attracts shoppers and differentiates itself from competitors, its high gloss surface (whether it is polyethylene, polypropylene, metallized or something else) is difficult to bond, often requiring a specialized adhesive.

The smoothness and often low surface energy of a high-gloss carton makes it difficult for adhesives to “wet out” and penetrate the surface. Unlike traditional corrugated adhesion, the hot melt doesn’t bond like a tree forming roots in the ground; rather, the chemical bond behaves more like a magnet. The two materials are attracted to each other because of their chemical make-up, not the mechanical adhesion of a root.

When adhering a high-gloss paper stock, we recommend working closely with your adhesive supplier since this particular application requires a specific hot melt with the ability to form a chemical bond to the surface of these high gloss paper stocks.

4. Clay coatings

Consider which logo would stand out more—the one printed on plain, recycled brown paper stock or the logo on white, clay-coated paper stock?  Often the latter, as clay coatings improve brightness and tend to really give any design printed on them that extra “pop,” so that the overall packaging appeals to customers.

Printing on a clay-coated paper stock also reduces the amount of ink used since it does not readily absorb it, unlike an uncoated paper stock. This same concept of resisting absorption is what makes adhesion to this surface difficult. Just as clay-coated paper stock doesn’t absorb ink, it doesn’t allow adhesive to easily penetrate its surface, making it difficult to form a bond.

Adhering clay-coated paper stocks requires a specialized hot melt that has the ability to “wet out” on the surface of the coating. This will allow the adhesive to “bite” through the surface and achieve a good, fiber-tearing bond.

As with all of the hard-to-bond coatings we’ve discussed, we cannot stress enough the importance of working with your adhesive supplier to help you find the right solution that will work for your specific application, whether it is bonding wax boxes, recycled corrugated, high-gloss or clay-coated paper stock. Having a trusting relationship with your adhesive supplier will set the foundation in optimizing your overall packaging process.

Lauren Oliva is the marketing communications specialist for RS Industrial, an adhesive manufacturer and distributor that has been helping customers improve their adhesive processes for more than 22 years. She is passionate about educating audiences as she works with packaging industry experts to provide informative content that is technically focused, yet clear and engaging.

Published by Packaging Digest

Written by Lauren Oliva in Adhesives on June 16, 2015

Liquid Packaging Market to Grow by 5.4% CAGR to 2021

Flexible Packaging for Liquid Product is on the Rise

Liquid packaging

The market size for liquid packaging is projected to reach $370.75 billion by 2021, registering a CAGR of 5.4% between 2016 and 2021, driven by high demand from the food and beverages industry while flexible liquid packaging is the fastest-growing liquid packaging type, globally.
According to a new report available through ReportsnReports.com, India, titled Liquid Packaging Market by Packaging Type (Flexible, Rigid), Resin

Increasing demand from the food and beverages industry is the major driver for the liquid packaging market. The global liquid packaging industry is expected to rise with increasing demand from the food and beverage industry in economies such as India, China, Africa, Middle East, Germany, Brazil, and others. Increasing carbon footprint due to use of various resins in the manufacturing of liquid packaging is the major restraint affecting the growth of the market.

Flexible liquid packaging is the fastest-growing liquid packaging type. This packaging type provides various advantages such as longer shelf life, less cost, consumer friendly, capable of retaining freshness of products, less energy consumption, green packaging, and others. Films are the largest flexible liquid packaging type used in the packaging of liquid products. Liquid packaging is widely used as it prevents the loss of moisture or protects the goods from moisture, improves tear, scuff, and puncture resistance, and provides a heat sealable surface.

Asia-Pacific is the largest market for liquid packaging globally, with China being the most dominant market. This region is also anticipated to witness highest growth rate, which is attributed to the rapid economic expansion in the region.Rapid development in the liquid packaging industry is also vigorously driven by the demand from food and beverages, medical and pharmaceutical, and other end-use industries in the region.

The report also includes company profiles and competitive strategies adopted by the major market players such as The Dow Chemical Co. (U.S.), International Paper (U.S.), Tetra Pak International S.A. (Switzerland), Smurfit Kappa (Ireland), Mondi Plc. (Austria), Sidel (Switzerland), BillerudKorsnäs (Sweden), Elopak (Norway), Evergreen Packaging (U.S.), and Weyerhaeuser (U.S.).

Learn more about custom aqueous coatings for flexible packaging here.

Article published by TAPPI, November 2016

What Sets UV, Aqueous and Laminates Apart?

Screen Shot 2016-01-24 at 1.50.00 PMGraphic finishers and commercial printers alike have constantly dealt with the challenges of matching the right coating or laminate with the printed sheet. Many factors are involved in this decision that can affect the outcome of the project. And while no set rules exist on choosing one over the other, there are specific advantages and disadvantages of each process that can help determine the best overall choice.

Ultra-Violet Coatings
UV is a very popular coating choice due mostly to the high gloss finish one can achieve, adding a brilliance to the finished sheet unlike any other coating method. UV coatings also provide good resistance to solvents and abrasion – much better than most water-based coatings. Because of its high sheen, UV coatings are popular on a wide variety of consumer products, including paperback books, trading cards, and cosmetic packaging.

However, UV coatings are not the best choice for all applications. Special precautions are necessary, especially when hot stamping foil, scoring, folding, or gluing is involved. Certain types of UV coatings can also cause cracking problems if the sheet or carton is to be scored and folded. UV coatings are a challenge when foil stamping is involved as well. If the coating has a high level of silicone, hot stamping foils will simply not adhere. Even special UV coatings without a heavy silicone addition are difficult in many situations. It is suggested to foil stamp first and then apply the UV coating to avoid potential problems. Even in this scenario, the foil stamper should check with its foil supplier to choose a foil that is overcoatable.

In addition, UV coatings have been known to yellow over long periods of time and are highly susceptible to fingerprinting. Environmental concerns also surround the use of UV coatings. Although very little waste is left to dispose of when applying UV, what is left is very toxic. Special arrangements are necessary to dispose of this waste.

Aqueous Coatings
Probably the number one advantage of aqueous coating is the cost savings you can achieve – especially in sheet-fed applications. Aqueous coatings are very user-friendly when additional finishing is necessary as well. They work efficiently over most printing process inks, wet over wet or in some cases, wet over dry. They also accept many glues and are very receptive to hot stamping foil.

Aqueous coating is promoted as environmentally friendly. There is a small percentage of solid waste (about 10%) left from an aqueous run and should still be handled with some precautions. It is certainly the environmental choice when compared to UV or film lamination.

Thermal Film Lamination
When protecting the printed sheet or carton from abrasion, chemicals, or even when fingerprinting is of utmost importance, film lamination is the best choice without exception.  Film lamination is available in several matte and gloss finishes and can even be applied with a special embossed roller that leaves a textured pattern over the laminated sheet.

As the number one advantage of aqueous coatings is the cost savings, a major deterrent to the use of film lamination is the price. High volume production of many packaging applications prohibits the use of thermal lamination because of the expense of the film itself and the slower off-line application used to apply the film compared to UV or water-based coatings. In addition, certain types of film laminates have a very low dyne count, meaning the surface tension of the sheet restricts the adhesion of other finishing processes, including hot stamping foils and glues. In the past, the film was corona treated, providing an acceptable surface. The challenge was that the corona treatment would wear off over a period of time. Special films have now been developed with a permanent chemical additive that will readily accept hot stamping foils and glues. If you have questions on the overstampability of the film, it may be wise to consider foil stamping before laminating the sheet.

As you can see, a great deal of analysis must go into the decision when choosing between UV coating, aqueous coating, and film lamination. From a graphic finisher’s point of view, you might think steering your customer towards UV or lamination (because you offer the service and know aqueous will be applied in-line) is the best choice. This certainly is not the right approach for long-term growth with the customer. Helping printers or other customers you work with analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the different coatings and laminates available and helping them match the right choice with the right application will solidify your position with the customer. Suggesting aqueous over UV when the application warrants it, will translate to a happier customer and a longer lasting relationship for the future.

Editorial by FSEA.com